In an age of wanting to protect the user from intrusive advertising, we are failing.
Most websites strive to provide the user with an entirely unique experience. However, web sites with a lot of traffic are allowing certain companies to place particularly grating banners on their home pages that diminish the effect they are trying to create. These types of banners belong to companies, which create databases of personal details they later sell.
It’s interesting how well the hook of a car draw or a cheesy trip works.
Studies have shown that the average person cannot be bothered to fill in more than four fields of personal information on a regular website but when faced with the opportunity to win an new Audi, they will happily fill in twelve.
And where do your personal details go? To a massive database later to be sold for a huge profit because they contain details about you that cannot be found anywhere else.
These companies must be quite powerful if they have been able to convince as reputable platforms as Spotify to accept their ads. The presence of these banners also reflects Spotify’s growing popularity within Spain as they wouldn’t be interested in advertising there if the traffic wasn’t so high.
So the question is: where should we set the limit on this type of advertising?
In theory, the user is the one who always sets the limit. After all, that’s the premise of the Internet, right? The user is the one with full control over his online experience. However, we have seen this is not completely true.
In other forms of media, such as TV or radio, advertising is usually scheduled. That is to say, the user knows the time when there will be a segment of advertising. In fact, some TV channels report advertising breaks and their duration in advance. In this case the user at least has more of an option: watch the ads or channel surf.
Going back to the Internet, surfing to avoid advertisements is not an option and even less so for intrusive advertising. We can ignore them – the known effect of selective vision – but the unexpected ads are so intrusive that unless they add some real value for the consumer, they risk creating the opposite effect desired by advertisers. More often than not, they spur animosity towards the advertising company as well as the page the user is visiting.
My point is this: if you want your users to come back to your site and to subscribe and recommend your page, you must be very cautious in choosing which forms of advertising you allow. These intrusive ads might play a dirty trick on your business, in addition to infecting the Net.